<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Helmet Laws Make Biking Less Safe?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sfcriticalmass.org/2009/12/13/do-helmet-laws-make-biking-less-safe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sfcriticalmass.org/2009/12/13/do-helmet-laws-make-biking-less-safe/</link>
	<description>words, history, ideas and more from San Francisco&#039;s Critical Mass</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 05:58:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why did some states change their laws for the requirements of motorcycle helmets? &#124; Ride Things</title>
		<link>http://www.sfcriticalmass.org/2009/12/13/do-helmet-laws-make-biking-less-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Why did some states change their laws for the requirements of motorcycle helmets? &#124; Ride Things</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfcriticalmass.org/?p=131#comment-259</guid>
		<description>[...] Do Helmet Laws Make Biking Less Safe? « SF Critical Mass [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Do Helmet Laws Make Biking Less Safe? « SF Critical Mass [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ozzmosis</title>
		<link>http://www.sfcriticalmass.org/2009/12/13/do-helmet-laws-make-biking-less-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>ozzmosis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfcriticalmass.org/?p=131#comment-152</guid>
		<description>From Bicycle Victoria&#039;s web site: &quot;Bicycle helmets became compulsory in Victoria on 1 July 1990.&quot;

My gut feeling - just from my own experience going to school in Melbourne in the &#039;90s - is that many children stopped cycling to school in Victoria after helmet laws were brought in because your average helmet at the time weighed too much and had poor airflow.  They were also pretty ugly compared to what you can get today.  Particularly the &quot;Stackhats&quot; from the mid &#039;80s.

Before 1990, some schools required their students wear a helmet if they were cycling to school.  If you were caught without one before or after school you might suffer some sort of punishment (detention, etc).  Weekends were your own responsibility.

These days I don&#039;t think helmets are really much of a problem for children.  Bikes aimed at children are generally a lot better than back in 1990, too - eg. mountain bikes with suspension and plenty of gears.  I think the issue is really just that there is much more motor traffic on the roads, and kids don&#039;t have many safe places to ride, and their parents know that.  Many parents don&#039;t want to cycle with their kids.  School teachers don&#039;t want to be seen encouraging potentially unsafe activity, so we now have whole generations of people who are missing out.  Probably many more children now that have never learnt to ride a bike now than there were in the late &#039;70s.  A bit sad really.

- ozz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Bicycle Victoria&#8217;s web site: &#8220;Bicycle helmets became compulsory in Victoria on 1 July 1990.&#8221;</p>
<p>My gut feeling &#8211; just from my own experience going to school in Melbourne in the &#8217;90s &#8211; is that many children stopped cycling to school in Victoria after helmet laws were brought in because your average helmet at the time weighed too much and had poor airflow.  They were also pretty ugly compared to what you can get today.  Particularly the &#8220;Stackhats&#8221; from the mid &#8217;80s.</p>
<p>Before 1990, some schools required their students wear a helmet if they were cycling to school.  If you were caught without one before or after school you might suffer some sort of punishment (detention, etc).  Weekends were your own responsibility.</p>
<p>These days I don&#8217;t think helmets are really much of a problem for children.  Bikes aimed at children are generally a lot better than back in 1990, too &#8211; eg. mountain bikes with suspension and plenty of gears.  I think the issue is really just that there is much more motor traffic on the roads, and kids don&#8217;t have many safe places to ride, and their parents know that.  Many parents don&#8217;t want to cycle with their kids.  School teachers don&#8217;t want to be seen encouraging potentially unsafe activity, so we now have whole generations of people who are missing out.  Probably many more children now that have never learnt to ride a bike now than there were in the late &#8217;70s.  A bit sad really.</p>
<p>- ozz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: random</title>
		<link>http://www.sfcriticalmass.org/2009/12/13/do-helmet-laws-make-biking-less-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>random</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sfcriticalmass.org/?p=131#comment-120</guid>
		<description>One thing that I&#039;ve noticed in reading about helmet laws online is that there seems to be a rabid (and, to me, inexplicable) population of folks who see helmet laws as just a step away from complete fascist domination of the citizenry, and they always seem to cite studies that seem to have a weird hidden agenda (like that one by the &quot;Bicycle Helmet Research Foundation,&quot; which if you google them they are clearly advocates against helmet laws).

Personally I think helmet laws would probably be a good idea (because it would destigmatise helmet use among beginners), but if people don&#039;t wear helmets I really don&#039;t care that much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that I&#8217;ve noticed in reading about helmet laws online is that there seems to be a rabid (and, to me, inexplicable) population of folks who see helmet laws as just a step away from complete fascist domination of the citizenry, and they always seem to cite studies that seem to have a weird hidden agenda (like that one by the &#8220;Bicycle Helmet Research Foundation,&#8221; which if you google them they are clearly advocates against helmet laws).</p>
<p>Personally I think helmet laws would probably be a good idea (because it would destigmatise helmet use among beginners), but if people don&#8217;t wear helmets I really don&#8217;t care that much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

